This file has some information on how to get access to
the latest PDL sources (mainly of interest for potential
developers). This should not be confused with the latest
public release which will always be available from CPAN (if
you don't know what that is check the FAQ).
Public CVS repository at www.sourceforge.org
--------------------------------------------
From version PDL-2.003 onwards the source distribution is in a
publicly accessible CVS repository. The project is hosted at the
sourceforge site at
http://sourceforge.net/projects/pdl/
Starting from that URL you will find directions on how to check out
the current sources, browse the CVS repository online, etc.
If you would like to actively contribute to PDL development don't
hesitate to contact one of the project admins (listed at the above
URL) to apply for write access to the repository. We strongly believe
in the power of open source development!
If you do not know how to use CVS try 'man cvs' or 'info cvs' and/or
have a look at some of the online tutorials available on the web.
The main CVS home page is at
http://www.nongnu.org/cvs/
and a very good/complete CVS reference is the online version of the
CVS book at
http://cvsbook.red-bean.com/cvsbook.html
PDL Developer Guidelines:
-------------------------
The following guidelines are for any developer that has access to the
PDL CVS repository.
1) Before committing a change to the repository you should update:
- CHANGES file with a description of the change made.
- MANIFEST (using 'make manifest'), MANIFEST.SKIP, TODO files if
applicable.
2) Remember to include POD documentation for any functions you add to
the distribution.
- See Basic/Core/Core.pm for an example of including POD
documentation in .pm files.
- See Basic/Core/Primitive/Primitive.pd for an example of
including POD documentation in PDL .pd files.
- read the documentation in PDL::Doc for a detailed description of
the PDL documentation conventions.
2) Make sure you add a test case in the 't' directory for any
significant additional capability you add to the PDL package.
Please use one the of the Test modules available within Perl
rather than doing-it-yourself as many of our tests do! The
recommended testing module is Test::More which now distributed
with the perl distribution.
3) Don't commit before you successfully built and passed 'make
test'. But then again, don't keep your changes private for too
long to avoid conflicts with other developers.
4) Bugs reported on the list should be entered into the bug database
and bugs closed when a patch has been committed as a fix. (Primary
responsibility for this task is the pumpking, but other devels
should be able to help.)
PDL Developer Notes:
--------------------
A (small) collection of random musings to note if you feel the need to
improve or add to PDL (please do):
*) Need help?
See the pdl-porters email list; details for subscription and access to
the archives can be found on the PDL web page at:
http://pdl.perl.org/maillists/index_en.html (English)
http://pdl.perl.org/maillists/index_de.html (German)
*) Access to PDL's configuration
If you need to access the configuration for PDL then use the
%PDL::Config variable. Prior to 2.4.1 this was a mess since you
had to use %PDL_CONFIG within Makefile.PL and PDL::Config from
*.pm/tests. The build process has been changed (I hesitate to say
"cleaned up" ;) to just use %PDL::Config consistently throughout.
- %PDL::Config is automatically available to you when you are in a
Makefile.PL within the PDL distribution. You can change the hash
and these changes will be stored in the PDL::Config module. You
should only change values when it makes sense (e.g. if the user
has specified that a module should be built but you find out this
is not possible).
- otherwise you can say 'use PDL::Config;' or - perhaps something like
eval 'require "' . whereami_any() . '/Core/Config.pm";';
where whereami_any() is from PDL::Core::Dev;
*) Location of temporary files
Please use $PDL::Config{TEMPDIR} for the directory in which to
place temporary files (e.g. when IO::File::new_tmpfile() is not
appropriate). This will make it easier for distributions to package
PDL since there will only be one place they need to change if the
default value causes problems.
This *includes* test cases as well as for Makefile.PL's!
Creating a new CVS branch:
--------------------------
(or how to avoid ridiculous branch names like
'badval_experimental_branchpoint')
This is a first draft, so it may not entirely be correct, and I've
missed out the initial options you'd supply to cvs (or put in an env
variable).
0) see what the current set of tags is:
> cvs status -v Changes
The important part of the output looks like:
Existing Tags:
badval_experimental_branchpoint (branch: 1.76.2)
trid_experimental2 (branch: 1.69.2)
trid_branchpoint2 (revision: 1.69)
etc
The badval_experimental branch wasn't created using the
following rules - I didn't do step 1, so ended up
with a branch name called 'badval_experimental_branchpoint'
when I meant it to be 'badval_experimental'.
1) tag the current CVS with a label to indicate the state of
PDL before the branch:
> cvs tag make-cup-of-tea_experimental_branchpoint
(this is the step I didn't do above)
2) create a branchpoint
> cvs tag -b make_cup_of_tea_experimental
3) you can then either check out a new version, using this branch
> cvs co -d PDL.tea -r make-cup-of-tea_experimental PDL
this creates a directory PDL.tea/ and stores the files there,
or convert a current version
> cvs update -r make-cup-of-tea_experimental
4) Make changes to this branch as normal (CVS knows that you are in
a branch, so 'cvs update' will now only merge in updates made to this
branch.).
5) When it comes time to merge your changes back into the main branch,
check out a copy of PDL and merge in the updates:
> cvs co -d PDL.merged PDL
> cd PDL.merged
> cvs update -j make-cup-of-tea_experimental
If you are lucky (or you manually went along and merged in the
main-branch updates to your branch as they were made) then you
do not have to do anything else. In this case the output when the
merges are made will look something like:
RCS file: /cvsroot/pdl/PDL/t/misc.t,v
retrieving revision 1.12
retrieving revision 1.12.2.1
Merging differences between 1.12 and 1.12.2.1 into misc.t
However, in the real world you are likely to find out that there are
conflicts in the merge, in which case you will see something like:
RCS file: /cvsroot/pdl/PDL/Makefile.PL,v
retrieving revision 1.44
retrieving revision 1.44.2.1
Merging differences between 1.44 and 1.44.2.1 into Makefile.PL
rcsmerge: warning: conflicts during merge
The file in question will then contain text within "<<<<<" and ">>>>>"
markers (I forget how many of them there are), separated by a line
of "=====" which indicate the conflicting parts of the file. The
main-branch version of the file is stored as .#<filename> for easy
comparison (or you could do a 'cvs diff').
These differences should be resolved and then the changes commited to
the main branch [CVS will either not allow you to merge - or will
complain about it, depending on the version - if there are any of these
lines left in the text].
> cvs commit -m "Merged in make-cup-of-tea branch"
> cvs tag make-cup-of-tea_experimental_merge1
The reason for tagging the main branch after the merge is to make
it easier to merge back any new changes made to the branch (if they
occur). The CVS manual contains more details on this.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Notes on transferring an external PDL module to the PDL
source tree for distribution with PDL.
-------------------------------------------------------------
Suppose you have developed a PDL module that resides in a
standalone source tree. You typically will need to have PDL
installed on your system before you can build this module.
If you wish to migrate the module into the PDL distribution
you will need to make certain changes to the module source
in order to built in the PDL distribution. You will need to
removed dependecies on a pre-existing PDL installation for
configuration and build of your module. This is because as
part of the PDL distribution, it is possible that PDL has
never been installed. Build processes based on PDL will then
fail.
Following is some specific advice that can help you do this.
[ These notes are very preliminary and are expected to be ]
[ revised and/or replaced by improved documentation. ]
Changes that must be made to files in your module source tree
if you are building the module from a .pd file :
Makefile.PL:
-- You must remove the line 'use PDL::Core::Dev;'.
-- The line 'PDL::Core::Dev->import();' must be present
-- You must change the call from 'pdlpp_postamble' to a call to
'pdlpp_postamble_int' (with the same arguments.)
-- It seems that most modules in the PDL source use
VERSION_FROM => '../../Basic/Core/Version.pm',
but not all of them in order that their version tracks
the PDL release version. It is possible to maintain
separate versioning even within the PDL source tree but
it may make things confusing.
Make certain that you make these changes to each 'Makefile.PL' in
your source tree.
Changes to the existing PDL source tree:
-- Edit the 'Makefile.PL' in the directory above your module source
to add your module directory name to
'DIR => [ qw/Module1 AnotherModule / ]'.
-- Add your test files (.t files) to the PDL/t directory renaming if
required to avoid namespace conflicts.
-- Does your module depend on any libraries or external
programs ? If so, doocument the required programs with version
numbers in PDL/DEPENDENCIES and add the PREREQ_* option to the
main Makefile.PL if required.
-- If your module requires external libraries or header files,
add a section to perldl.conf. The hash values with be available
in your module's 'Makefile.PL' as $PDL::Config{WITH_MYMODULE},...