David Golden >
Statistics-RankOrder-0.12 >
Statistics::RankOrder

Module Version: 0.12
Statistics::RankOrder - Algorithms for determining overall rankings from a panel of judges

use Statistics::RankOrder; my $r = Statistics::RankOrder->new(); $r->add_judge( [qw( A B C )] ); $r->add_judge( [qw( A C B )] ); $r->add_judge( [qw( B A C )] ); my %ranks = $r->mean_rank; my %ranks = $r->trimmed_mean_rank(1); my %ranks = $r->median_rank; my %ranks = $r->best_majority_rank;

This module offers algorithms for combining the rank-ordering of candidates by a panel of judges. For the purpose of this module, the term "candidates" means candidates in an election, brands in a taste-test, competitors in a sporting event, and so on. "Judges" means those rank-ordering the candidates, whether these are event judges, voters, etc. Unlike "voting" algorithms (e.g. majority-rule or single-transferable-vote), these algorithms require judges to rank-order all candidates. (Ties may be permissible for some algorithms).

Algorithms included are:

- Lowest-Mean
- Trimmed-Lowest-Mean
- Median-Rank
- Best-of-Majority

In this alpha version, there is minimal error checking. Future versions will have more robust error checking and may have additional ranking methods such as pair-ranking methods.

`new`

$r = Statistics::RankOrder->new();

Creates a new object with no judges on the panel (i.e. no data);

`add_judge`

$r->add_judge( [qw( A B C D E )] );

Adds a judge to the panel. The single argument is an array-reference with the names of candidates ordered from best to worst.

`best_majority_rank`

my %ranks = $r->best_majority_rank;

Ranks candidates according to the "Best-of-Majority" algorithm. The median rank is found for each candidate. If there are an even number of judges, the worst of the two median ranks is used. The idea behind this method is that the result for a candidate represents the worst rank such that a majority of judges support that rank or better. Ties in the median ranks are broken by the following comparisons, in order, until the tie is broken:

- larger "Size of Majority" (SOM) -- number of judges ranking at median rank or better
- lower "Total Ordinals of Majority" (TOM) -- sum of ordinal rankings of judges ranking at median rank or better
- lower "Total Ordinals" (TO) -- sum of all ordinals from all judges

If a tie still exists after these comparisons, then the tie stands. (In practice, this is generally rare.) When a tie occurs, the next rank assigned after the tie is calculated as if the tie had not occured. E.g., 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 4th, 5th.

Returns a hash where the keys are the names of the candidates and the values are their rankings, with 1 being best and higher numbers worse.

`candidates`

my %candidates = $r->candidates;

Returns a hash with keys being the names of candidates and the values being array references containing the rankings from all judges for each candidate.

`judges`

my @judges = $r->judges;

Returns a list of array-references representing the rank-orderings of each judge.

`mean_rank`

my %ranks = $r->mean_rank;

Ranks candidates according to the "Lowest Mean Rank" algorithm. The average rank is computed for each candidate. The candidate with the lowest mean rank is placed 1st, the second lowest mean rank is 2nd, and so on. If the mean ranks are the same, the candidates tie for that position. When a tie occurs, the next rank assigned after the tie is calculated as if the tie had not occured. E.g., 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 4th, 5th.

Returns a hash where the keys are the names of the candidates and the values are their rankings, with 1 being best and higher numbers worse.

`median_rank`

my %ranks = $r->median_rank;

Ranks candidates according to the "Median Rank" algorithm. The median rank is found for each candidate. If there are an even number of judges, the worst of the two median ranks is used. The idea behind this method is that the result for a candidate represents the lowest rank such that a majority of judges support that rank or better. The candidate with the lowest median rank is placed 1st, the second lowest median rank is 2nd, and so on. If the median ranks are the same, the candidates tie for that position. When a tie occurs, the next rank assigned after the tie is calculated as if the tie had not occured. E.g., 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 4th, 5th.

Returns a hash where the keys are the names of the candidates and the values are their rankings, with 1 being best and higher numbers worse.

`trimmed_mean_rank`

my %ranks = $r->trimmed_mean_rank( N );

Ranks candidates according to the "Trimmed Lowest Mean Rank" algorithm. The average rank is computed for each candidate after dropping the N lowest and N highest scores. E.g. `trimmed_mean_rank(2)`

will drop the 2 lowest and highest scores. The candidate with the lowest mean rank is placed 1st, the second lowest mean rank is 2nd, and so on. If the mean ranks are the same, the candidates tie for that position. When a tie occurs, the next rank assigned after the tie is calculated as if the tie had not occured. E.g., 1st, 2nd, 2nd, 4th, 5th.

- Lingua::EN::Number::Ordinate -- for converting "1" to "1st", etc.

For further details on various ranking methods, in particular, the "Best of Majority" method, see the following articles:

- "Rating Skating", Gilbert W. Basset and Joseph Persky, Journal of the American Statistical Association, volume 89, Issue 427 (Sept 1994), pp. 1075-1079
- "The Canadians Should Have Won!?", Maureen T. Carroll, Elyn K. Rykken, and Jody M. Sorensen. http://mathcs.muhlenberg.edu/~rykken/skating-full.pdf

The following commands will build, test, and install this module:

perl Build.PL perl Build perl Build test perl Build install

Please report bugs using the CPAN Request Tracker at http://rt.cpan.org/NoAuth/Bugs.html?Dist=Statistics-RankOrder

David A Golden (DAGOLDEN)

dagolden@cpan.org

Copyright (c) 2005 by David A Golden

This program is free software; you can redistribute it and/or modify it under the same terms as Perl itself.

The full text of the license can be found in the LICENSE file included with this module.

syntax highlighting: