View on
Paul Evans > Test-Refcount > Test::Refcount



Annotate this POD


Open  1
View/Report Bugs
Module Version: 0.08   Source  


Test::Refcount - assert reference counts on objects


 use Test::More tests => 2;
 use Test::Refcount;

 use Some::Class;

 my $object = Some::Class->new();

 is_oneref( $object, '$object has a refcount of 1' );

 my $otherref = $object;

 is_refcount( $object, 2, '$object now has 2 references' );


The Perl garbage collector uses simple reference counting during the normal execution of a program. This means that cycles or unweakened references in other parts of code can keep an object around for longer than intended. To help avoid this problem, the reference count of a new object from its class constructor ought to be 1. This way, the caller can know the object will be properly DESTROYed when it drops all of its references to it.

This module provides two test functions to help ensure this property holds for an object class, so as to be polite to its callers.

If the assertion fails; that is, if the actual reference count is different to what was expected, either of the following two modules may be used to assist the developer in finding where the references are.

See the examples below for more information.


is_refcount( $object, $count, $name )

Test that $object has $count references to it.

is_oneref( $object, $name )

Assert that the $object has only 1 reference to it.


Suppose, having written a new class MyBall, you now want to check that its constructor and methods are well-behaved, and don't leak references. Consider the following test script:

 use Test::More tests => 2;
 use Test::Refcount;
 use MyBall;
 my $ball = MyBall->new();
 is_oneref( $ball, 'One reference after construct' );

 # Any other code here that might be part of the test script
 is_oneref( $ball, 'One reference just before EOF' );

The first assertion is just after the constructor, to check that the reference returned by it is the only reference to that object. This fact is important if we ever want DESTROY to behave properly. The second call is right at the end of the file, just before the main scope closes. At this stage we expect the reference count also to be one, so that the object is properly cleaned up.

Suppose, when run, this produces the following output (presuming Devel::FindRef is available):

 ok 1 - One reference after construct
 not ok 2 - One reference just before EOF
 #   Failed test 'One reference just before EOF'
 #   at line 16.
 #   expected 1 references, found 2
 # MyBall=ARRAY(0x817f880) is
 # +- referenced by REF(0x82c1fd8), which is
 # |     in the member 'self' of HASH(0x82c1f68), which is
 # |        referenced by REF(0x81989d0), which is
 # |           in the member 'cycle' of HASH(0x82c1f68), which was seen before.
 # +- referenced by REF(0x82811d0), which is
 #       in the lexical '$ball' in CODE(0x817fa00), which is
 #          the main body of the program.
 # Looks like you failed 1 test of 2.

From this output, we can see that the constructor was well-behaved, but that a reference was leaked by the end of the script - the reference count was 2, when we expected just 1. Reading the trace output, we can see that there were 2 references that Devel::FindRef could find - one stored in the $ball lexical in the main program, and one stored in a HASH. Since we expected to find the $ball lexical variable, we know we are now looking for a leak in a hash somewhere in the code. From reading the test script, we can guess this leak is likely to be in the bounce() method. Furthermore, we know that the reference to the object will be stored in a HASH in a member called self.

By reading the code which implements the bounce() method, we can see this is indeed the case:

 sub bounce
    my $self = shift;
    my $cycle = { self => $self };
    $cycle->{cycle} = $cycle;

From reading the Devel::FindRef output, we find that the HASH this object is referenced in also contains a reference to itself, in a member called cycle. This comes from the last line in this function, a line that purposely created a cycle, to demonstrate the point. While a real program probably wouldn't do anything quite this obvious, the trace would still be useful in finding the likely cause of the leak.

If Devel::FindRef is unavailable, then these detailed traces will not be produced. The basic reference count testing will still take place, but a smaller message will be produced:

 ok 1 - One reference after construct
 not ok 2 - One reference just before EOF
 #   Failed test 'One reference just before EOF'
 #   at line 16.
 #   expected 1 references, found 2
 # Looks like you failed 1 test of 2.



Peter Rabbitson <> - for suggesting using core's B instead of Devel::Refcount to obtain refcounts


Paul Evans <>

syntax highlighting: